TINLIANTHANG VAIPHEI
Dilip Singhania – Appellant
Versus
Basant Singhania – Respondent
Tinlianthang Vaiphei, J.
1. This civil revision is a typical example of bad drafting, which is becoming more and more frequent and pronounced in these days the Court is sometimes left to struggle by it-self to ascertain the wish of the petitioner or to imagine by itself his case the valuable time of this Court could have been avoided had little attention been paid to it at the drafting and editing stage. This petition runs into as many as 13 pages with 27 paragraphs with numerous but unnecessary and repetitive facts pleaded therein and, that too, without chronological order some extra efforts or proper application of mind and proper editing could have easily enabled the petitioner to compress all the relevant facts in hardly eight pages with some 15 paragraphs or so. It is, to say the least, irritating. Ordinarily, the easiest thing to be done by this Court in such a case is to dismiss the petition on the ground of incoherence, ambiguity and beyond one's grasp. Pleadings are required to be drafted in a simple, coherent and grammatically correct English, that too, in a chronological order as well as comprehensible manner, and should also be precise, comprehensive and to the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.