I.A. Ansari, J.

1. Apart from seeking, with the help of the present application, made under Section 482 CrPC., quashing of the complaint, which gave rise to Complaint Case No.9695C/2006, on the ground that the complaint, in question, is not sustainable in law inasmuch as the complaint does not disclose commission of any offence, the petitioners have also sought for quashing of the order, dated 02.01.2007, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, whereby, having taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, has directed issuance of summons against, amongst others, the present petitioners as accused. The case of the complainant may, in brief, be set out as under :

(i) The complainant is the Managing Director of M/S Shiva Bottles Private Limited; whereas the accused No. 1, namely, M/S Samsung India Electronic Private Limited Company is a company, with accused No. 2, as its Public Relation Officer and the accused No. 3, as the proprietor of Triveni Infotech, is a retailer of the products of M/S Samsung India Electronic Private Limited Company.

(ii) The complainant purchased a Samsun