C.R.SARMA
Tania Kar – Appellant
Versus
Avijit Roy – Respondent
C.R. Sarma, J.
1. By this revision petition, the petitioner-wife has challenged the correctness, legality and propriety of the judgment and order, dated 15.07.2009, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura, in Misc. Case No. 116/2009, whereby and where under, the learned Judge, awarded maintenance allowance of Rs. 12,000/- per month in favour of the petitioner, thereby modifying the earlier interim maintenance allowance of Rs. 20,000/- per month, granted by the order, dated 25.04.2009, passed in Misc.(Int.)117 of 2009.
2. I have heard Mr. D.P. Kundu, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. R. Guha, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner and Mr. P. Rathor, learned Counsel, appearing for the respondent.
3. Mr. Kundu, learned senior counsel, appearing for the petitioner, taking this Court through the impugned judgment and order, dated 15.07.2009, the judgment and order, dated 25.04.2009 aforesaid, and the pleadings of the parties, has submitted that, the learned Judge, Family Court, committed error and illegality by reducing the maintenance allowance, without any evidence on record in support of such modification and without giving any opportunity
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.