SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Gau) 285

BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Gautam Construction – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Sharma, J.

1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by annexure I assessment order dated August 27, 2001 affirmed on revision and appeal vide annexures III and v. orders dated July 4, 2002 and December 10, 2003, respectively.

2. As stated in the writ petition, the Petitioner had executed 3 (three) sub-contracts worth Rs.98,12,479 with the principal contractors within Assam and the same were not reflected in the return since according to the Petitioners, there was no liability for payment of tax in respect thereof. However, the Superintendent of Taxes, Dhubri, by his assessment order dated August 27, 2001 held otherwise on the basis of Rule 14(1)(c) of the Assam General Sales Tax Rules, 1993. Dealing with the contentions raised on behalf of the Petitioner that the aforesaid amount of Rs.98,12,479 was not shown by the Petitioner in its annual return as the same was in respect of the sub-contracts, such contention on behalf of the Petitioner was repelled by the assessment order dated August 27, 2001 holding that as per the provisions of Rule 14 of the Rules of 1993, the Petitioner would be liable to pay tax on such sub-contract.

3. Being aggrieved, the Petitioner approached the revisi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top