I.A.ANSARI
Redaul Hussain Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. The present three applications have been made, under Section 439Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail by the accused-Petitioners, namely, 1. Redaul Hussain Khan, 2. Ahshringdaw Warisa @ Partha Warisa and 3. Md. Sameer Ahmed, in connection with National Investigation Agency Case No. 01 of 2009 (Corresponding to Basistha Police Station Case No. 170 of 2009) under Sections 120(B)/121/121(A) IPC read with Section25(1B)(A) of Arms Act and Sections 17/18/19 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
2. By this common order, 1 propose to dispose of all the three Bail Applications inasmuch as all the three Bail Applications, involving identical questions of law, have been, on the request made by the learned Counsel for the parties, heard together.
3. The facts, giving rise to these Bail Applications, may, in brief, be set out as under:
(i) Basistha P.S. Case No. 170/2009, under Section 120B/121/121(A) IPC read with Section 25(1B)(A) Arms Act, was registered against two accused persons, namely, Phojendra Hojai and Babulal Kemprai, on the ground that, on 01.04.2009, at about 4-00 p.m., when vehicle Nos. AS-01-AH-1422 and AS-01-1-0609 were intercepted at 14th Mile
Bhim Sen v. State of U.P. AIR 1955 SC 435
Attiq-ur-Rehman v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (1996) 3 SCC 37
Usmanbhai Dawoodbhai Memon v. State of Gujarat (1988) 2 SCC 271
A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak (1984) 2 SCC 500
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kishan Lal (1991) 1 SCC 705
State of Gujarat v. Salimbhai Abdulgaffar Shaikh and Ors. (2003) 8 SCC 50
Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Admn) (1978) 1 SCC 118
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.