SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Jasti Chelameswar and Arun Chandra Upadhyay, JJ.
Md. Sahidur Rahman
Vs.
Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
PIL No. 43 of 2008
Decided On: 18.02.2009

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: G.U. Ahmed, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: B. Goyal, State Counsel and K. Das, Standing Counsel, BTC

Genuine public interest is a prerequisite for filing a PIL, and the petitioner must approach the court with clean hands, heart, mind, and objective.

Headnote:

PIL - Jurisdictional Dispute - Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India - [S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (AIR 1982 SC 149), Holicow Pictures Pvt. Ltd. v. Prem Chandra Mishra (AIR 2008 SC 913)] - The court addressed a PIL regarding the jurisdictional dispute over sand and gravel mahals between the Bodoland Territorial Council and the Dhubri Forest Division of the Government of Assam. The court emphasized the need for genuine public interest in PIL and dismissed the petition as it lacked public interest.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a PIL seeking to retain sand and gravel mahals under the jurisdiction of the Dhubri Forest Division, alleging illegal claims by the Bodoland Territorial Council.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petition lacked genuine public interest and dismissed it at the admission stage.

Issues: Jurisdictional dispute over sand and gravel mahals, alleged illegal claims by the Bodoland Territorial Council, and lack of genuine public interest in the PIL.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for genuine public interest in PIL and cited precedents to highlight the importance of clean heart, clean mind, and clean objective in public interest litigation.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed for lack of genuine public interest.

JUDGMENT

A.C. Upadhyay, J.

1. Heard Mr. G.U. Ahmed, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs. B. Goyal, learned Counsel for State Respondents. Also heard Mr. K. Das, learned Standing Counsel, BTC.

2. This Public Interest Litigation has been filed by the Petitioner praying for a direction to retain Khoraghat Sand-cum-Gravel Mahal and Soulmari Sand-cum-Gravel Mahal, located outside the jurisdiction of Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), under the jurisdiction of Dhubri Forest Division of the Govt, of Assam. The Petitioner has stated in the writ petition that Khoraghat Sand and Gravel Mahal and Soulmari Sand-cum-Gravel Mahal, both located on the riverbed of Sonkosh/Tipkai rivers, are situated within the administrative jurisdiction of Dhubri Forest Division of Govt, of Assam. It has been alleged by the Petitioner that Bodoland Territorial Council has been illegally claiming administrative control of Khoraghat Sand and Gravel Mahal. The Petitioner submits that the aforesaid unjustified claim of the Bodoland Territorial Council has caused public resentment.

It will be pertinent to quote the prayer of the writ Petitioner, which is as follows:

In the premises aforesaid your humble Petitioner prays to your Lordship to be graciously pleased to admit this PIL petition, call for the record, issue rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, direction or order of like nature should not be issued to the effect that the Khoraghat Sand-cum-Gravel Mahal and Soulmari Sand-cum-Gravel Mahal being located out side the jurisdiction of Boro territorial council and inside the jurisdiction of the Dhubri Forest Division, shall be retained under the jurisdiction of the Dhubri Forest Division under Government of Assam.

3. Facts leading to filing of this PIL are as follows:

That, Khoraghat Sand and Gravel Mahal and Soulmari Sand-cum-Gravel Mahal are operating under the administrative control of the Dhubri Forest Division, as they are situated outside the Bodoland Territorial Council area and the issue relating to transfer of the aforesaid two Sand and Gravel Mahals occurred only when the Conservator of Forest, Council Head of Department of Forest, Bodoland Territorial Council, Kokrajhar, the Respondent No. 8 in the writ petition, wrote Annexure-A/2 letter No. F.24/Dhubri/Khoraghar/SGM/2006-08 dated 9.8.2006, to the Chief Conservator of Forest (T), Assam claiming to operate Khoraghat Sand and Gravel Mahal by them. However, upon plain reading of the said letter at Annexure-A/2, it transpires that in fact a request was made by Respondent No. 8, on behalf of the Bodoland Territorial Council, in order to ensure proper management and operation of Khoraghat Sand-cum-Gravel Mahal to enable the Officer in charge of the Range to control illegalities in the forest adjoining the river Mahal as the Range Office is strategically located for controlling the illegalities in the river Mahal and forests situated in the surrounding area.

4. The Petitioner affirmed that though the Govt, of Assam has not yet announced its final decision regarding the allotment of these Mahals, nevertheless, Bodoland Territorial Council authorities, have been purportedly interfering with the normal functioning of the Dhubri Forest Division. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner deduced that if the said Mahals are transferred to Bodoland Territorial Council areas, it would jeopardize the rights and privileges of the non-Bodo people living near the said two Mahals.

5. As a matter of fact, Bodoland Territorial Council is an Autonomous District created within the State of Assam, in terms of the provisions of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India, In our opinion, there cannot be any rationale, whatsoever to broach a question of curtailment of constitutional rights of non-Bodo people, notwithstanding transfer of supervision and management of Sand-cum-Gravel Mahals from one wing to another wing of the Government. On the top of i












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top