BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Bidyut Buragohain – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
B.K. Sharma, J.
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 16.4.2008 and 28.8.2008 passed respectively by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority. By the first order, the petitioner has been awarded with the major penalty of compulsory retirement from service and by the second order, the departmental appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected.
2. The petitioner was a member of the Assam Police Service (APS 1993 batch). While he was serving at Lakhimpur as Additional Superintendent of Police, he was placed under suspension by order dated 10.7.2001 in contemplation of a departmental proceeding. He was so placed under suspension when one Shri Gajen Bhuyan, a militant of United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) was found staying in his residential campus and was picked up by the Army with arms and ammunitions. An FIR was lodged with the statement that the said militant alongwith two others had given number of extortion calls/notices to some persons of the area called Boginadi.
3. The aforesaid order of suspension dated 10.7.2001 was followed by the order dated 9.8.2001 by which an enquiry committee was constituted headed by the Commissioner, North A
Punjab National Bank and Ors. v. Shri Kunj Behari Misra reported in AIR 1998 SC 2713
Ram Kishan v. Union of India AIR 1996 SC 255
BRPL v. Girish Chandra Sarma AIR 2007 SC 2860
Director (Marketing) IOC Ltd. v. Sontosh Kumar (2006) 11 SCC 147
Mathura Prasad v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 437
IOC v. Ashok Kumar Arora (1997) 3 SCC 72
Channabasappa Basappa Happali v. State of Mysore AIR 1972 SC 32
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.