SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Gau) 5

BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Bidyut Buragohain – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Sharma, J.

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 16.4.2008 and 28.8.2008 passed respectively by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority. By the first order, the petitioner has been awarded with the major penalty of compulsory retirement from service and by the second order, the departmental appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected.

2. The petitioner was a member of the Assam Police Service (APS 1993 batch). While he was serving at Lakhimpur as Additional Superintendent of Police, he was placed under suspension by order dated 10.7.2001 in contemplation of a departmental proceeding. He was so placed under suspension when one Shri Gajen Bhuyan, a militant of United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) was found staying in his residential campus and was picked up by the Army with arms and ammunitions. An FIR was lodged with the statement that the said militant alongwith two others had given number of extortion calls/notices to some persons of the area called Boginadi.

3. The aforesaid order of suspension dated 10.7.2001 was followed by the order dated 9.8.2001 by which an enquiry committee was constituted headed by the Commissioner, North A


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top