SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Gau) 35

A.K.GOSWAMI
JAYANTA BARUAH – Appellant
Versus
DILIP BARUAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. P. Kataki, Mr. D.K. Bagchi
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Sarma

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (CAV)

By this application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for short, the Code, the petitioners pray for setting aside of the order dated 30.11.2010, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barpeta in C.R. Case No. 4632/2010 taking cognizance of offence under sections 500/34 I.P.C. against the petitioners and the proceeding in C.R. Case No. 4632/2010.

2. Heard Mr. P. Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. R. Sarma, learned counsel for the complainant/opposite party.

3. On the request of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter was taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

4. The opposite party had filed the complaint case, amongst other, against the petitioner No. 1 as accused No. 1 being the proprietor of an Assamese daily newspaper, “Asomiya Pratidin” and the petitioner No. 2, represented by the petitioner No. 1, as accused No. 5, being the press, from which the issue dated 01.10.2010 of the said newspaper “Asomiya Pratidin” containing a defamatory article under the heading “Pub Bajali Zilla Parishodor unnayon dhowa-changot –- Pratibadot Xorob Raij – NREGAt durnity : Jobcardprapto shramikor hahakar






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top