SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 161

BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Umesh Chandra Bhuyan – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Sharma, J.

1. The dispute raised in the writ petition relates to seniority between the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 and the consequential claim for charge of Principal of the school in question.

2. The petitioner was first appointed on 20.5.1973, as Assistant Teacher of Tulsibari M.E. School by the Managing Committee of the school. Subsequently his service was regularized with effect from 20.5.1973. The school was provincialised with effect from 1.3.1978 and the petitioner was appointed as the Headmaster of the school for a period of three months by an order dated 19.10.1979 issued by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Rangia. Thereafter he was allowed to act as Headmaster by subsequent orders issued from time to time extending his services. Eventually by Annexure-C order dated 21.1.1980 his services as Headmaster was extended until further order.

3. As against the aforesaid position of the petitioner, the respondent No. 4 was first appointed on 20.12.1972 as Assistant Teacher of a High School called Borghuli Neheru High School, which was subsequently provincialised with effect from 1.10.1977. The respondent No. 4 was transferred to the school called Tulsibari Bahumu




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top