BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Gopal Chandra Patowary – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Biplab Kumar Sharma, J.
1. The Petitioners, the erstwhile Councillors of the Gauhati Municipal Corporation (GMC), who otherwise would have continued as Councillors upto January, 2009, but for the dissolution of the elected body by the impugned order, have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court assailing the legality and validity of the action on the part of the State Respondents towards dissolving the elected body.
2. As stated above, the Petitioners are the elected Councillors of the GMC representing different Wards. Be it stated here that the last general election of the GMC was held for 57 Wards and 57 Councillors got elected, out of which one died. Be it also stated here that the general strength of the body is maximum 60. Records have revealed that in addition to the elected members, there are 8 ex-officio members with voting rights.
3. A general meeting of the elected body of the Corporation was held on 7.5.2008 and amongst others the resolution for election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor was also adopted. As per the resolution, the election was to be held on 22.5.2008. Such resolution had to be adopted as the term of office of both the Mayor and the Deputy Mayor was to
Mahinder Singh Gill v. The Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405
Bhikhubhai Bhithlabhai Patel v. State of Gujarat (2008) 4 SCC 144
S.L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan AIR 1981 SC 136
Taralochan Dev Sharma v. State of Punjab (2001) 6 SCC 260
Gyan Chand and Ors. v. State of Haryana (1970) 3 SCC 270
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.