SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 605

BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Mega Kleen – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Brojendra Prasad Katakey, J.

1. The petitioner, which is a registered partnership firm, favoured with a contract by the respondent Railways for washing of bedroll linens, pursuant to the notice inviting tender (NIT) dated 19.5.2006, by the present writ petition has challenged the said NIT to the extent of prescribing relaxation of eligibility criteria and splitting up of the work, as well as the order dated 8.5.2007 (Annexure-F) issued by the respondent No. 4, requesting the respondent No. 5 to develop its infrastructure for washing of bedroll linens at the place mentioned in its tender paper and to complete the work within 06-09 months so that 20% work of bedroll washing can be allotted to it in the first year which may increase up to 50% of daily offered quantity on satisfactory performance during the subsequent contractual period as per terms and conditions of the NIT and further requesting it to intimate the completion of necessary infrastructure as per its commitment given in the tender papers so that the necessary agreement can be executed after spot verification by the Railways.

2. A notice inviting tender (NIT) was issued by the NF Railway authority on 19.5.2006 invi

























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top