SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 283

BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Tarik Doke – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Sharma, J.

1. The challenge made in this writ petition is the Annexure-7 notification dated 3rd July, 2006 by which the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, under the signature of its Secretary, has notified the selection for appointment of the incumbents named therein as Junior Specialist Doctors in the disciplines mentioned against each candidate.

2. The petitioners as well as the private respondents are the MBBS degree-holders with Post Graduate degree/diploma in different streams. In response to the advertisement dated 24th January, 2006 for 31 posts in different disciplines, the petitioners and the private respondents along with others offered their candidature. It is submitted that for 31 posts, only 50 applications were received. In terms of the advertisement in which it was notified that the selection would be made through viva-voce test and interview only, the selection was conducted by the Public Service Commission and pursuant to such selection, the impugned notification dated 3rd July, 2006 has been issued notifying the selection for appointment of the 25 candidates named in the notification for various disciplines. While the private respondents have


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top