IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (IMPHAL BENCH)
B.D. Agarwal, J.
Nambam Mangi Singh and Ors.
Vs.
Keisham (N) Inakhunbi Devi and Ors.
Decided On : 11.12.2006
Fraud - Inheritance Dispute - Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8 - The judgment discusses the inheritance dispute over a suit land and the application of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8. The court upheld the decree in favor of the maternal aunts and uncle of the land owner, declaring the earlier decree obtained by committing fraud. The court also highlighted the legal provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and their interpretation in determining the line of inheritance.
Fact of the Case:
The suit involved an inheritance dispute over a land property. The court analyzed the genealogy of the parties and the line of inheritance based on the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8. The court also addressed the issue of fraud committed in obtaining the earlier decree and the possession of the suit land by one of the defendants.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the earlier decree obtained by the appellant was fraudulent and declared it null and void. The court upheld the decree in favor of the maternal aunts and uncle of the land owner, based on the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8. The court also affirmed the possession of the suit land by one of the defendants.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the line of inheritance and the validity of the earlier decree obtained by the appellant. The court also addressed the possession of the suit land by one of the defendants and the procedural aspects of the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8, which governs the general rules of succession in the case of male Hindus. The court also considered the evidence of fraud committed in obtaining the earlier decree and the procedural aspects of the trial.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, upheld the decree in favor of the maternal aunts and uncle of the land owner, and affirmed the possession of the suit land by one of the defendants. The court also directed both parties to bear their own expenses of the appeal.
B.D. Agarwal, J.
1. This is the third round of litigation. The earlier suit was filed by the present appellant No. 1, Shri Nambam Mangi Singh. The appellants No. 2 and 3 were the proforma defendants. Respondent No. 5, Smt. Phijam (N) Nungshitombi Devi was the principal Defendant No. 1. The said suit was registered as Title Suit No. 2 of 1989. The suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs, which was challenged in the court of District Judge. The appeal was numbered as F.A. No. 1 of 1995. While disposing of the appeal, the suit was remanded back for fresh disposal vide judgment and order dated 16.01.1994. This remand order was assailed in the High Court vide Second Appeal No. 9 of 1996. The High Court approved the order of remand. Accordingly, the suit went back to the original court for fresh disposal. Thereafter, the suit was re-numbered as Original Suit No. 40 of 2000. This time the suit was dismissed on 31.11.2001. However, the trial Court's judgment was set aside in F.A. No. 5 of 2002. The said decree was assailed before this Court in Second Appeal No. 2 of 2002. This Second Appeal was dismissed, upholding the decree in favour of Shri Mangi Singh vide judgment and order dated 14.8.2003.
2. In the third round, the maternal aunts and uncle of the land owner, Inakhunbi Devi, Khomdonbi Devi, Pashot Devi and (L) Jayantakumar Singh instituted the instant suit seeking a decree of rights, title and interest over the same suit land. The suit was registered as Original Suit No. 45 of 2003 in the court of Civil Judge, Sr. Division No. 1, Manipur East. Subsequently, the suit was re-numbered as 19 of 2004. The plaintiffs also prayed for a declaration that the earlier decree passed in favour of Shri Mangi Singh, affirmed in First Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2001 as well as in the Second Appeal No. 2 of 2002, was obtained by committing fraud. In other words, the plaintiffs also prayed for a decree to set aside the earlier decree and consequential relief of perpetual injunction against Shri Mangi Singh. Other defendants of the previous suit were impleaded as proforma defendants.
3. The learned Addl. District Judge (FTC), Manipur East has decreed the suit in favour of Smt. Inakhumbi Devi and others and has also decreed that the earlier decree passed in favour of Shri Mangi Singh by the District Judge, Manipur East on 10.4.2002 in First Appeal No. 5 of 2001 and affirmed by the High Court in Second Appeal No. 2 of 2002 were fraudulently obtained. The learned trial judge has further declared that the plaintiffs shall inherit the suit land with the building situated thereon and more particularly described in Schedule A of the plaint under rule of succession laid down in Section 8 read with Clause II, Entry IX of the Schedule of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, (hereinafter the 'H.S. Act' in brief). This judgment and decree is under challenge in the present appeal.
4. I have heard at length, Shri Ch. Robinchandra, learned Counsel for the appellants and Shri A. Nilamani Singh, learned senior counsel, assisted by Shri A. Bimol Singh, learned Counsel for the respondents. I have also perused the impugned judgment; the judgment of the second appeal as well as the records.
5. Before entering into the merits of the appeal, it would be apposite to give a brief history as to how the parties are related to each other and how the cause of action has arisen. The suit land was the acquired property of late Nambam Kunjabihari Singh, S/O (L) N. Parijat Singh. The said Kunjabihari Singh died in the year 1940 leaving behind his widow Apabi Devi and two sons, namely, Jayantakumar Singh and Tamphamani Singh. Tamphamani Singh died in the year 1937 without any survivor. Jayantakumar Singh also died in the year 1987 without leaving any legal heirs. The present appellants are the sisters and nephews/niece of Apabi Devi (mother of Jayantakumar Singh).
6. Jayantakumar Singh's grandfather, Parijat Singh had 5 (five) half-blood brothers through his stepmother. Late N. Paka Sing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.