SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 1114

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, D.BISWAS, P.G.AGARWAL
In Re: State of Assam – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.G. Agarwal, J.

1. The facts in brief leading to the present revision may be noted:

2. The respondent Sri Hari Chandra Hatimuria was arrested by Police in connection with Silapathar P. S. Case No. 133/2006 and produced the Chid Judicial Magistrate, Dheniaji on 26-9-2006. The allegation in the F. I. R. is that the accused who is a school teacher, called Ms. Sumpi Gogol, a teenaged illiterate girl to his house for cleaning rice and after the work was over, the accused threatened her and took her inside the house and, thereafter, forcibly committed rape on her. The accused threatened the teenaged girl with dire consequences if she discloses the incident to others. Subsequently, she informed about the incident to her parents whereupon the F. I. R. was lodged. The statement of the alleged victim was recorded under Section 161, Cr. P.C. and, thereafter, she was sent to the Court where her statement was recorded under Section 164, Cr. P.C.

3. On his production before the Court, the accused filed an application for bail stating inter alia that he is suffering from illness and he is undergoing treatment at Dibrugarh Hospital. On 13-9-2006, the application for bail was filed on behalf





































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top