T. Vaiphei, J.

1. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against a common interlocutory order dated 8-12-2006 purportedly passed under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and under Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, by the learned District Judge, Shillong in Misc. (Main) Petition. Nos. 13(H) and 14(H) of 2006 directing the revision-petitioner to pay Rs. 1,000/- per month to the respondent and another sum of Rs. 500/- per month to her minor child for their respective maintenance.

2. The relevant facts giving rise to this revision petition are not in dispute. The petitioner was married to the respondent on 26-8-2002 in. accordance with the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, and the same was duly registered with the Office of the Registrar of Marriage, East Khasi Hills District, Megbalaya. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was again solemnized on 3-10-2002 at Kamakhya Temple at Guwahati according to Hindu rites. From this marriage, a male child, namely, Master Hritik Das, who is now aged about 4 years, was born to them on 1-9-2003. The minor boy is in the custody of the re