SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 50

H.N.SARMA
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mintu Debnath – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.N. Sarma, J.

1. This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the appellant Insurance Company challenging the legality and the validity of the judgment and Award dated 12.7.2004 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in TS (MAC) Case No. 228/2003 awarding a sum of Rs. 2,76,000.00 to the claimant respondent directing to be indemnified by the appellant Insurance Company.

2. I have heard Mr. D.K. Biswas, learned Counsel for the appellant Insurance Company and Mr. Somik Deb, learned Counsel for the claimant respondent.

3. The claimant filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Agartala, registered as TS (MAC) No. 28/2002 praying for compensation amounting to Rs. 35,00,000.00 for the injuries sustained by him on account of vehicular accident that took place at Baramura on Assam Agartala Road alleging rash and negligent driving of the vehicle bearing registration No. TR-01-A-1517 (Truck) wherein the claimant was travelling on the fateful day.

4. It is pleaded by the claimant respondent in the claim petition, inter alia, is that on 5.2.2002 while he was travelling i










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top