AMITAVA ROY
Ajay Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Amitava Roy, J.
1. The notification dated 5.6.2004 placing the Petitioner under suspension and the continuance thereof is under challenge in the instant proceeding.
2. I have heard Mr. A.K. Bhattacharjee, Sr. Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. I. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Public Works Department, Government of Assam (hereinafter referred to as the Department) for the official Respondents.
3. A summarized version of the pleaded facts would sufficiently provide the factual background. The Petitioner on being selected by the Assam Public Service Commission was appointed as an Assistant Engineer under the Department, in the year 1973 and on 7.5.99 was promoted to the post of Executive Engineer. By notification dated 26.2.2004, his selection along with other equally placed incumbents in service for promotion to the rank of Superintendent Engineer, P.W.D. (Civil) was approved. In the meantime, he had been posted as the Executive Engineer (Roads) in the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund-II Division where he joined on 13.5.2002. As the Executive Engineer of the department, the Petitioner was put in change of various development projects being implemented under the RIDF
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.