IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Brojendra Prasad Katakey, J.
Piklu Das - Appellants
Vs.
Union of India (UOI) and Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No. 2692 of 2002
Decided On : 21.03.2005
Compassionate Appointment - Rejection of Appointment - National Savings Organisation - [Smt. Sushma Gosain and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (1990) ILLJ 169 SC, National Hydro Electric Power Corporation and Anr. v. Nanak Chand and Anr. AIR 2004 SCW 6339] - The court discussed the rejection of the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment, emphasizing the purpose of appointment on compassionate grounds to mitigate the hardship due to the death of the bread earner in the family. The court highlighted that there should not be any delay in appointment and no one can insist for appointment to a particular post. It also emphasized that appointment on compassionate ground is not another source of recruitment but merely an exception to the open recruitment, taking into account the fact of the death of the employee while in service leaving his family without any means of livelihood. The court also noted that the authority is required to see whether such appointment is really necessary and that the scheme for appointment on compassionate ground is formulated out of purely humanitarian consideration.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought appointment on compassionate grounds after the death of his father, who was a Lower Division Clerk in the National Savings Organisation. The authority rejected the petitioner's claim for appointment on compassionate grounds, citing failure to submit necessary documents and insistence on appointment as Lower Division Clerk.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner failed to submit the necessary documents for appointment as Peon and insisted on appointment as Lower Division Clerk, despite repeated requests and reminders. The court also noted the subsequent abolition of vacant posts in Group 'C' and 'D' cadres by the Government of India as a measure of economy.
Issues: The issues revolved around the rejection of the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment, the failure to submit necessary documents, and the insistence on a specific post for appointment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that appointment on compassionate ground is meant to mitigate the hardship due to the death of the bread earner in the family and that there should not be any delay in appointment. It also highlighted that no one can insist for appointment to a particular post and that the scheme for appointment on compassionate ground is formulated out of purely humanitarian consideration.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment, and upheld the rejection of the appointment on compassionate grounds.
B.P. Katakey, J.
1. The writ petitioner by the present writ petition has challenged the communication dated 12th February, 2002 issued by the Regional Director, National Savings, Assam Region, Government of India, Ministry of Finance rejecting the prayer for appointment on compassionate ground for the reason that in spite of repeated request and reminders issued by the authority he did not submit the requisite papers for appointment as Peon on compassionate ground and on the other hand insisted for appoint as Lower Division Clerk and also on the ground of subsequent abolition of all the vacant posts in Group 'C' and Group 'D' cadres in the National Savings Organisation as a measure of economy by the Government of India vide communication dated 11th June, 2001. The writ petitioner by the present writ petition has also prayed for directing the respondents to appoint him on compassionate ground.
2. I have heard Mr. A. K. Goswami, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner assisted by Mr. M. K. Das and also Ms. N. D. Sarmah, learned Central Government Counsel.
3. The case of the writ petitioner in the writ petition is that his father Pabitra Chandra Das, who was working as Lower Division Clerk in the Office of the Deputy Regional Director, National Savings Organisation, Government of India died in harness on 17th January, 1998 and the petitioner being eligible for appointment as Lower Division Clerk filed an application on 11.2.1998 for appointment as such on compassionate ground, which was forwarded by the Deputy Regional Director, National Savings Organization to the Deputy National Savings Commissioner and as required by the authority he submitted all the requisite documents including his willingness to serve any where in India vide his communication dated 3.4.98. Thereafter the petitioner received a communication dated 11.6.98 from the authority directing to submit application in prescribed format alongwith affidavit of willingness to be appointed as Peon any where in India. The writ petitioner thereafter approached this court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2842 of 1999 which was disposed of on 31.7.2001 with a direction to the authorities to reconsider the application for appointment to the post of Lower Division Clerk on compassionate ground. The Regional Director thereafter issued the impugned communication dated 12th February, 2002 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground for the reasons stated in the said communication.
4. Mr. Goswami, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that since the Government of India has a scheme for appointing the sons and daughters of government servant, who died in harness, on compassionate ground, the authority is bound to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground in any posts commensurate to his qualification. According to the learned Senior Counsel though there is still requirement for his appointment, as the financial hardships still continues, for the death of sole bread earner of the family. Since the authority vide communication dated 23rd March, 1999 rejected the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment as Lower Division Clerk, the petitioner approached this Court by way of W.P.C. No. 2842 of 1999 and in spite of direction issued by this court to the authority concerned to reconsider the matter, has not appointed the petitioner on compassionate ground and instead issued a communication dated 12th February, 2002 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment on the ground that he did not submit the requisite papers for appointment as Peon in spite of repeated requests and reminders, for which he could not be appointed on compassionate ground and also by citing the reasons that the Government of India subsequently vide communication dated 11-6-2001 abolished all the vacant posts in Grade 'C" and 'D' cadres in the Organisation as a measure of economy. According to Mr. Goswami th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.