H.N.SARMA
Subhash Project and Marketing Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
H.N. Sarma, J.
1. In this batch of writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the jurisdictional authority of the Deputy Commissioner, Papumpare District, Yupia in the State of Arunachal Pradesh to entertain the applications under Section 34of the Arbitration and Conciliations Act, 1996 filed by the petitioners praying for setting aside the award passed by the arbitrator in the matter of the related dispute that arose between the parties, have been challenged.
2. The State of Arunachal Pradesh having invited tender on 26.9.1992 for execution of 5 (five) Micro Hydel Schemes For installation in the East Siang district (02 Nos), West Siang district (01 No) and Tawang district (02 Nos), the Petitioners submitted their tenders and the contracts were awarded to them. The aforesaid Micro Hydel Projects were, sought to be implemented Keeping in view the acute power shortage in the State and to meet the demand and develop the power sector of the State. The tenders of the petitioners having been accepted by the department a letter of acceptance dated 17.3.1993 was issued and in terms of the said letter, the Petitioner was a1lotte the contract in question for c
Shri Kumar Padma Prasad v. Union of lndia and Ors. (1992) 2 SCC 428;
High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan v. Ramesh Chand Paliwal and Anr. (1998) 3 SCC 72;
State of Nagaland v. Ratan Singh AIR 1967 SC 212;
Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India Ltd. 1999 (2) SCC 479;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.