IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
P.G. Agarwal and Iqbal Ahmed Ansari, JJ.
Pulu Mura
Vs.
State of Assam
Criminal Appeal No. 127(J) of 2002, Cri. D. Ref. Case No. 2 of 2003
Decided On: 14.05.2003
INSANITY PLEA - CRIMINAL OFFENSE - Section 302, IPC - Section 84, IPC - Section 313, Cr.P.C. - Section 354(3), IPC - Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab - Macchi Singh v. State of Punjab - Lehna v. State of Haryana - Janaki Das v. State (Delhi) - T. N. Lakshmaiah v. State of Karnataka - Ratanlal v. State of Madhya Pradesh - Sher Ali Wali Md. v. State of Maharashtra - Oyami Ayatul v. State of Madhya Pradesh - Mayajul Ali v. State of Assam
Fact of the Case:
The accused was charged with the murder of his four children. The prosecution's case relied on circumstantial evidence and the accused's extra judicial confession. The accused pleaded insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the plea of insanity, holding that the accused was not of unsound mind at the time of the incident. The accused was found guilty of the offense under Section 302, IPC and was initially sentenced to death.
Issues: The main issue was whether the accused was of unsound mind at the time of the incident, and if the death penalty was appropriate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles established in various cases including Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab and Macchi Singh v. State of Punjab to determine the appropriateness of the death penalty. The court considered both aggravating and mitigating circumstances to reach its decision.
Final Decision: The death sentence was replaced by imprisonment for life, and the accused was also ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default to further imprisonment for one month.
P.G. Agarwal, J.
1. Criminal Appeal 127(J) of 2002 and Criminal Death Reference Case No. 2 of 2002 were heard analogously and disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. In Sessions Case No. 97(T)/98, the accused appellant Pulu Mura, (hereinafter referred to as the accused) was charged for commission of the offence under Section 302, IPC on the allegation that in between the night of 14-2-1998 and 15-2-1998, he caused the death of his four children, namely, (1) Mantu Mura, (2) Kanchi Mura, (3) Sagi Mura and (4) Mangri Mura. The eldest of the four children was aged about 10 years and the youngest was about 3 years old. The prosecution allegation, as emerged from the evidence on record, is that the wife of the accused-appellant, Pulu Mura, left him and eloped with another person about 3 months prior to the occurrence and thereafter, the accused was residing in his house along with his four children. On the evening of 14-2-1998 the four children had gone to neighbours house to witness T.V. and they allegedly returned late. On the next date (day) morning the accused was seen sitting in the Verandah in his house, whereupon his father, Siva Mura (P.W. 1), who used to reside in a separate house in the same compound, enquired from him about the children as he (P.W. 1) had not seen the children The accused was armed with a dao and he informed P.W. 1 that he had killed his children, entered into the house of the accused. They saw blood marks all over the place and found the dead bodies of the four children of the accused lying there.
3. P.W. 5 is Dr. M.N. Gogol, who held autopsy over the dead bodies and found as follows:
"Monto Mura.
Injuries were as follows :
One lacerated wound in the left parital sculp of the skull of size 8 cm x 2 cm bone exposed.
Cranium and spinal canal, Sculp injury described under wound No. 1 skull fracture of the left parital bone of size 6 cm x 3 cm depressed fracture.
Membrane Lacerated at the fracture side.
Brain : Brain Lacerated and haemorrhage from it."
Kanchan Mura.
Injuries :
(1) Incised wound in the upper part of the neck right side of size 8 cm x 1 cm muscle deep.
(2) One incised wound in the right parital sculp of sized 15 cm x 1 cm bone cut and brain matter out to the exterior.
(3) One incised wound in the chest wall upper part 7 cm x 1 cm muscle deep.
Cranium and spinal Canal : Sculp and skull injury described under wound No. 2 membrane cut under the injury No. 2.
Brain : Brain cut and haemorrhage from it under wound No. 2."
Sagi Mura
INJURIES :
(1) One incised wound in the left parital region of the sculp of size 4 cm x 0.5.cm bone cut and brain matter out.
(2) One incised wound in the right scapular region of seized 10 cm x 2 cm bone cut.
(3) Incised wound in the left scapular region of size 8 cm x 2 cm bone cut in that region.
(4) One incise wound in the chin of size 3 cm x 0.5 cm bone cut.
Cramium and spinal canal : Sculp injury described under the wound No. 1 skull bone cut in the injury No. 1. Membrane cut under the wound No. 1. Brain cut and haemorrhage from it described under the injury No. 1. Brain cut and haemorrhage from it described under the wound No. 1."
Mongri Mura
Injuries :
(1) Multiple bruises in the chest wall with blakish colour of the skin.
(2) Lacerated wound in the occipital region of the sculp of the skull of size 6 cm x 2 cm and bone exposed.
Cramium and spinal canal, Sculp injury described in the wound No. 2.
Skull occipital bone fracture (sic) of size 4 cm x 2 cm.
4. In the opinion of the Doctor, the deaths were due to shock and haemorrhage/comma resulting from the ante mortem injuries, which were caused by heavy blunt object in the case of Manto Mura and Mangri Mura and by heavy sharp cutting weapon in the case of Kanchan Mura and Sagi Mura.
5. The Gaonburah and other villagers came to the place of occurrence and they have deposed about the four dead bodies lying inside the house of the accused. In view of the oral and medical evidence on record and considering the age of the deceased an
Ratanlal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1971 SC 778
Sher Ali Wali Md. v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1972 SC 2443
Oyami Ayatul v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1974 SC 216
T.N. Lakshmaiah v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 1 SCC 219
Dahyabhai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1964 SC 1563
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.