SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Gau) 10

SARJOO PROSAD
Maleka Khatun – Appellant
Versus
Azimuddin Ahmed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.N.Phukan, H.Goswami, B.M.Goswami

This appeal is directed against an order of Mr. B. Goswami, Subordinate Judge, Upper Assam Districts, Jorhat, dated 10-3-58, in Misc. Appeal No. 14 of 1957. By the order in question, the learned Subordinate Judge allowed the appeal of the judgment-debtor holding that the execution case was time-barred and reversing the decision given by the learned Munsiff in favour of the decree-holder. The order, in my opinion, is misconceived and has to be set aside.

(2) The decree to which the execution case relates was passed in Title Suit No. 47 of 1952 in favour of the decree-holder appellant, giving vari­ous reliefs to the decree-holder, namely, for eject­ment, for Khas possession and for compensation. The date of the decree is 15-11-52. Execution was started on the basis of the decree in Execution: Case No. 73 of 1953, which .was filed on 25-11-53, obviously well within three years of the date of the decree.

It appears that the judgment-debtor appeared in the execution case and filed objections under Sec. 47, C. P. Code, but his objections were over­ruled, and he failed even on appeal. Ultimately, however, the execution case was dismissed for de­fault on 31-8-56. Almost immediately thereafte













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top