SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Gau) 62

BAHARUL ISLAM
Batuk Chandra Patwari and others – Appellant
Versus
Kirti Ram Das and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K. Goswami, D.K. Bhattacharjee

Judgement

JUDGMENT:- This application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order dated 10-3-71 passed by the Munsiff, Nalbari, in Title Suit No.27/70. The facts briefly are that the plaintiffs brought the suit for declaration of their title in respect of 2/3rd share of the land described in the schedule to the plaint and for confirmation of possession thereof. They valued the suit at Rupees 250/-, both for the purpose of courts pecuniary jurisdiction and for Court-Fee under Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court-Fees Act. The contesting defendants (defendants No.2 to 9) in their written statement stated that the valuation of the suit land would be at least Rs.23,600.00 and therefore, according to them, the Munsiff had no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit. The Munsiff framed three preliminary issues, namely Issues Nos.8, 4 and 5 which are as follows:-

3. Whether the suit is properly valued for determination of the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court? 4. Whether proper Court-fee is paid?

5. Whether the Court has pecuniary Jurisdiction to try the suit?

2. The learned Munsiff after hearing the said preliminary issues passed the following order:

"It appears fr





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top