BAHARUL ISLAM
Kamal Chandra Dutta etc – Appellant
Versus
Ram Chandra Goala and another – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :- These two Miscellaneous Second Appeals which arise out of the same impugned order, are directed against the order of the learned Assistant District Judge No. 1, Gauhati, made in his appellate jurisdiction against an order passed by the learned Munsiff No. 2 of Gauhati on an application under Section 144 of the Civil P.C. The points of law involved are also common.
So this order of mine will dispose of both of them.
2. Radha Mohan Goenka was the plaintiff in the original suit. He brought the suit No. 61 of 1971 against the sole defendant, Ram Chandra Goala, for declaration of title and recovery of khas possession of the suit land in the court of Munsiff No. 1 at Gauhati. The suit was subsequently transferred to the Court of the Munsiff No. 2, Gauhati, and it was numbered as Title Suit No. 15 of 1971. The plaintiff obtained an ex parte decree against the defendant in the suit on 13-11-1971. The plaintiff-decree-holder executed the decree and evicted the defendant on 3-1-1973 by demolishing his houses standing on the suit land. On 6-1-1973 the defendant filed an application under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the application was registered as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.