S.N.PHUKAN
Mahamad Biloo – Appellant
Versus
Kirti Nath Gogoi – Respondent
2. The complainant's case is that he was running a shop in the left corner of the Jorhat Fish market -after obtaining due permission of the Jorhat Municipal Board But on 6.11.78 the accused-respondent along with some labourers of the Municipality demolished his shop and took away all goods and articles worth about Rs. 775/-. Complainant has also alleged that he sustained a total loss of Rs. 13,000/-. The complainant filed a complaint petition before the court and the court after making preliminary inquiry issued summons against the accused-respondent under sections 379/427 of the Indian Penal Code. After examining the witnesses on behalf of the complainant the trial court framed charges under the aforesaid sections against the accused person to which be pleaded not guilty.
3. Five witnesses were examined on behalf of the complainant. Statement of the accused person was duly recorded who stated that as per orders of the Executive Magistrate and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.