J.M.SRIVASTAVA, MANISANA
Dibyendu Bikash Sen Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors – Respondent
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is an advocate. He required judicial stamps (Court-fees) for Rs. 1,14,660.25 for use of the same in a proceeding for succession certificate. On 20.11.85, Le deposited a sum of Rs. 1,14,660.25 in the State Bank of India, Agartala Branch under a treasury challan. On 21.11.85, the petitioner handed over the challan to the Treasury Officer (II), Agartala, who was authorised officer to supply the stamps. On 23.11.85, in the morning, it was detected by the petitioner that due to bonafide mistake instead of writing the words "Judicial-stamps" in the appropriate column of the challan, the "Non-judicial stamps" were written. It was brought to the notice of the Treasury Officer at once with a request to permit the petitioner to rectify the defect. The Treasury Officer expressed his inability to help the petitioner in the matter. Therefore, the petitioner submitted an application to the Collector (re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.