SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Gau) 98

J.M.SRIVASTAVA, MANISANA
Dibyendu Bikash Sen Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Chakraborty

This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitu­tion of India for issue of an appropriate writ or order quas­hing the order dated 5.2.86 and other subsequent orders refu­sing to supply judicial stamps (Court-fees) to the petitioner.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is an advocate. He required judicial stamps (Court-fees) for Rs. 1,14,660.25 for use of the same in a proceeding for succession certificate. On 20.11.85, Le deposited a sum of Rs. 1,14,660.25 in the State Bank of India, Agartala Branch under a treasury challan. On 21.11.85, the petitioner handed over the challan to the Treasury Offi­cer (II), Agartala, who was authorised officer to supply the stamps. On 23.11.85, in the morning, it was detected by the petitio­ner that due to bonafide mistake instead of writing the words "Judicial-stamps" in the appropriate column of the challan, the "Non-judicial stamps" were written. It was brought to the notice of the Treasury Officer at once with a request to permit the petitioner to rectify the defect. The Treasury Officer expre­ssed his inability to help the petitioner in the matter. There­fore, the petitioner submitted an application to the Collector (re


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top