SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Gau) 170

M.SHARMA
Gajendra Nath Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Pipersenia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Barua, R.P.Kakati, J.M.Choudhary, D.Choudhary

The complainant/petitioner an office Assistant in the Office of the then Sub-Divisional Officer, Nalbaii, while discussing with Smti Dharitri Devi and Shri Khanindra Narayan Roy, Office Assistants in the Office of the Superin­tending Engineer, PWD National Highway, Nalbari about letting out a room of the complainant, the respondent suddenly appeared from behind and gave blows on the head and slapped on his face alleging that the petitioners was taking bribe from the two aforesaid persons. At the order of the opposite party his body guards took the petitioner to the opposite party with the said two persons and the complainant was rebuked by the opposite party. The compla­inant-petitioner alleged that his reputation was lowered before the eyes of the public and accordingly filed the complaint under section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The trial Court after examining the complainant on oath called upon the complainant to produce witnesses in support of his case under section 202 CrPC on 12.4.85 by his order held that sanction under section 197 CrPC as per provisions of the Assam Amendment Act, 1983 required to proceed against the opposite party and held that a reference to




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top