SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Gau) 103

D.N.BARUAH
Sohani Devi – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Nath Kalita – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.Choudhary, S.P.Roy, H.N.Sharma, B.D.Goswami , M.Ali

This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.7.93 passed by the Second Assistant District Judge, Guwahati in Money Execution Case No. 32 of 1962 dismissing the case. It is really sad that the litigation in respect of execution of a decree passed on 11.8.61 in Money Suit No. 37 of 1960 has been prolonged for such a long time.

2. Petitioner filed an execution case (Money Execution Case No. 32 of 1962) in the Court of the Sub Judge, Nagaon (as was it then). This case was subsequently transferred to the Court of the Sub Judge, Guwahati for execution of the said decree in respect of an area of land measuring 131/2 lechas situated at Sahar Guwahati, Block No.2, Fancy Bazar. The said land was purchased by the petitioner in an auction sale. Thereafter, the judgment debtor (opposite party) resisted the decree by filing Annexure C objection, stating, inter alia that he did not know about filing of the execution case and therefore, prayed for two months' time to take necessary steps before delivery of possession of the land to the decree-holder (petitioner) by demolishing the structures standing thereon.

3. That Assistant District Judge, No 2, by order dated 2.3.84 rejected
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top