1997 Supreme(Gau) 124
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
A.K.Patnaik, J.
Assam Financial Corporation Employees Union -Appellant
Versus
State of Assam -Respondent
Civil Rule No. 2870 of 1996
Decided On : 25-07-1997
Important Points
Subject
Administrative Law - Delegated Legislation
Act Referred
STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS ACT : S.23
Headnote
ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION - EMPLOYEES - PAY SCALES - REVISION - POWER OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS - APPROVAL OF STATE GOVERNMENT - NECESSITY - INTERPRETATION OF SECTIONS 23, 48 OF THE STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS ACT, 1951 AND REGULATION 65 OF THE ASSAM FINANCIAL CORPORATION STAFF REGULATIONS, 1957.
Fact of the Case:
The Assam Financial Corporation Employees Union filed a writ petition challenging the letter issued by the Officer on Special Duty, Finance (Pay Research Unit) Department, which rejected the proposal to increase the pay scales of certain managerial cadres of the Assam Financial Corporation (AFC). The union contended that the Board of Directors of the AFC had the power to fix the remuneration of its employees under section 23 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (SFC Act) and Regulation 65 of the Assam Financial Corporation Staff Regulations, 1957 (Staff Regulations), and that the approval of the State Government was not required.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Board of Directors of the AFC could not increase the pay scales of the managerial cadres without amending the Staff Regulations with the prior approval of the State Government. The court interpreted sections 23 and 48 of the SFC Act and Regulation 65 of the Staff Regulations and held that the remuneration payable to all categories of officers, advisers, and employees other than those specified by the State Government under the proviso to section 23 of the SFC Act would have to be provided in the Staff Regulations. The court further held that the State Government could not reject the proposal to increase the pay scales of the managerial cadres merely on the ground that it was likely to have an impact on the pay scales of other State Government Corporations/Boards.
Issues: 1. Whether the Board of Directors of the AFC had the power to increase the pay scales of the managerial cadres without amending the Staff Regulations with the prior approval of the State Government. 2. Whether the State Government could reject the proposal to increase the pay scales of the managerial cadres merely on the ground that it was likely to have an impact on the pay scales of other State Government Corporations/Boards.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Board of Directors of the AFC could not increase the pay scales of the managerial cadres without amending the Staff Regulations with the prior approval of the State Government. The court interpreted sections 23 and 48 of the SFC Act and Regulation 65 of the Staff Regulations and held that the remuneration payable to all categories of officers, advisers, and employees other than those specified by the State Government under the proviso to section 23 of the SFC Act would have to be provided in the Staff Regulations. The court further held that the State Government could not reject the proposal to increase the pay scales of the managerial cadres merely on the ground that it was likely to have an impact on the pay scales of other State Government Corporations/Boards.
Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned letter issued by the Officer on Special Duty, Finance (Pay Research Unit) Department, and directed the State Government to examine the proposal for increase of the pay scales of different managerial cadres of the AFC contained in the letter dated 17.6.1992 of the Managing Director of the AFC afresh on its merits in the light of the observations made in the judgment and to communicate its decision to the Managing Director of the AFC within a period of three months from the date of the judgment.
R.Gogoi, P.Pathak, P.Barman, B.K.Goswami, S.S.Dey
2. The facts briefly are that the Assam Pay Commission, 1988, made some recommendations on revision of pay scales of the employees of the State Public Sector Units of the State of Assam. The said recommendation were accepted by the State Govt and were circulated by letter dated 21.10.91 of the Govt of Assam Finance (Pay Research Unit) Department to the different departments of Govt of Assam for the purpose of implementation by the State Public Sector Units under their administrative control. The AFC implemented the said recommendations of Assam Pay Commission, 1988 and the employees of the AFC received revised 'pay as per the said recommendations of the Assam Pay Commission, 1988. But thereafter, the employees of the AFC submitted a representation that the employees of other Public Sector Undertakings of the State of Assam such as the Assam Industrial Development Corporation (for short the AIDC) performing identical nature of duties and work were getting higher scales of pay and that the scales of pay of the employees of the AFC may be increased aecordingly. The Board of Directors of the AFC in its 246th meeting held on 3.2.92 considered the said representation and decided to form a Sub Committee to go into the details of the Pay Commission's Report vis-a-vis the representation. The Sub Committee submitted its report on 28.5.92 suggesting higher scales of pay of the employees belonging to the managerial cadres of the AFC. The recommendations of the Sub Committee were considered by the Board of Directors of the AFC in its 248th meeting held on 28.5.92. The Board of Directors approved the said recommendations and decided that steps should be taken to complete the necessary formalities to implement the recommendations. Thereafter, the Managing Director of the AFC wrote a letter dated 176.92 to the Financial Commissioner, Govt of Assam, seeking approval of the proposal of the Board of Directors for increasing the scales, of pay of the aforesaid employees as per the said recommendations but by letter dated 4.7.92 issued by the Officer on Special Duty (Pay Research Unit), the Managing Director, AFC, was informed that the Govt in the Finance Department was of the opinion that the proposal for increase in the scales of pay in the letter dated 17.6.92 of the Managing Director is not tenable in view of its likely impact on the scales of pay of other State Govt Corporations/Boards. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer to quash the letter dated 4.7.95 of the Officer on Special Duty. Finance (Pay Research Unit) Department has prayed for a Mandamus directing the respondents-authorities to implement the recommendations of the said Sub Committee for revision of the scales of pay of different categories of employees of the AFC.
3. At the hearing, Mr. R. C|ogpi, learned counsel foijthe petitioner, contended that under section 23 of the State Financial Corporation's Act, 1951 (for short the SFC Act), the AFC has the power to fix the remuneration payable to its employees by regulation and in exercise of the said powers, the AFC has made the Assam Financial Corporation Staff Regulations., 1957 (for short the Staff Regulations) Mr. Gogoi further pointed out that the Staff Regulations have been made with the previous sanction of the State Govt of Assam as provided in section 48 of the SFC Act. Regulation 65 of the Staff Regulations provided that except as provided in the Staff Regulations or as may be prescribed by the Board, the pay and allowances of the employees shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Appendices I and II t