BRIJESH KUMAR, D.N.CHOWDHURY
Tabong Pasar – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated July 30,1997 passed in Civil Rule No. 3446 of 1994 by which the said civil rule was dismissed. The petitioner-appellant had impugned the order of termination of his services in the above noted civil rule. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment the present appeal has been preferred by the petitioner-appellant.
2. The facts which are not in dispute are that the Govt of Arunachal Pradesh advertised for recruitment to the post of Sub Inspector of Police in response thereof the petitioner-appellant offered himself as a candidate. A list of selected candidates was published, the petitioner-appellant being at serial No. 1 in the said list. On the basis of the selection the petitioner-appellant was given an appointment by order dated January 20, 1994, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure A to the civil rule. The said letter of appointment says that the petitioner-appellant and others were being appointed in purely temporary capacity as Sub Inspector under the Arunachal Pradesh Police. The order further provides that the appointees would be on probation for a period of 2 year
Parshotam Lal Dhingra vs. Union of India
Anoop Jiaswal vs. Govt of India
Governing Council of Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore vs. Dr. Pandurang Godwalkar
M. Venugopal vs. The Divisional Manger, Life Insurance Corporation of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.