SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 170

BRIJESH KUMAR, D.N.CHOWDHURY
Tabong Pasar – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.Barua, N.K.Barua, D.S.Bhattacharyya

Brijesh Kumar, C. J.-

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated July 30,1997 passed in Civil Rule No. 3446 of 1994 by which the said civil rule was dismissed. The petitioner-appellant had impugned the order of termination of his services in the above noted civil rule. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment the present appeal has been preferred by the petitioner-appellant.

2. The facts which are not in dispute are that the Govt of Arunachal Pradesh advertised for recruitment to the post of Sub Inspector of Police in response thereof the petitioner-appellant offered himself as a candidate. A list of selected candidates was published, the petitioner-appellant being at serial No. 1 in the said list. On the basis of the selection the petitioner-appellant was given an appointment by order dated January 20, 1994, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure A to the civil rule. The said letter of appointment says that the petitioner-appellant and others were being appointed in purely temporary capacity as Sub Inspector under the Arunachal Pradesh Police. The order further provides that the appointees would be on probation for a period of 2 year


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top