SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 183

P.C.PHUKAN
All Manipur Dic Supervisors Association – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.Nandakumar Singh, A.Nilamani Singh

I have heard Mr. A. Nilamani, learned senior counsel for the petitioner

Association as well as Mr. T. Nandakumar, learned Advocate General, Manipur for the State respondents.

2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the Manipur DIC Supervisors Association, formerly called the Manipur DIC Field Staff Employees' Association. DIC stands to District Industries Centre.

3. The petitioner Association's 68 members were initially appointed and designated as Field Organiser (Cottage/Handloom) and Economic Surveyor in the DICs. in the pay scale of Rs. 325-710 per month. There were four other posts, namely, Supervisor (Infrastructure), Supervisor (Credit), Supervisor (Marketing) and Supervisor (Technical) in the DICs.

4. Considering that the DICs Field Organisers and Economic Surveyors on the one hand and Surveyors on the other requiring more or less same essential qualifications, discharge same or similar functions, the respondent No.4 Director of Industries wrote to the respondent No.2, Secretary (Industries) vide Annexure A/1 dated 28.2.83 to convey an approval of the Govt for equalisation of pay scale and status of the Field Organisers, Economic Surveyors























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top