SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 375

J.N.SARMA
Sambar Rangpi – Appellant
Versus
Guwahati Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.Ahmed , S.P.Roy, S.N.Deb Nath, C.Barua, S.N.Sharma

These two writ applications raise same question of law and facts and as

such they are taken up for hearing together.

2. Civil Rule No.4299 has filed for issue of a Mandamus directing the respondents to release the earnest money of Rs.1,88,500/- along with interest thereof and with further prayer that the clause Nos 5 and 7 of the Notice Inviting Tender (herein after called NIT) dated 12.3.96 Annexure No.l should be declared as illegal, void, unreasonable, unfair and against the public conscience.

2. In Civil Rule No.4326 of 1996 the prayer has been made to release the earnest money of Rs. 85,0007- along with interest 10% and clause No.3 of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT), Annexure 1 should be declared as void, illegal, unreasonable, unfair and against the general public conscience. Clause 3 is typing mistake, it should be clause 5.

3. In Civil Rule No.4299 the tender notice dated 12.3.96 was issued by the Commissioner, Guwahati Municipal Corporation, Guwahati for settlement of check gates under the Guwahati Municipal Corporation for the year 1996-97 and that tender notice is Annexure 1 of this writ application. Clauses 5,6 and 7 which are relevant of that tender notice are quoted below:

“C



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top