SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Gau) 91

P.G.AGARWAL
Surya Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.Goswami, M.K.Choudhary, B.K.Sharma, M.Bhuyan, B.Banerjee, A.K.Phukan

Both these civil rules are being disposed of by this common order. Although the facts are different the question of law that arises for determination is common, 8 that is, whether a direction in the nature of Mandamus can be issued by the Court for appointment of candidates impaneled in the Select List after the expiry of the validity of the Select List and whether the validity of the Select List can be extended by the Court.

2. I have heard Mr. AK Phukan and Mr. BK Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners of the respective writ petitions and Mr. D. Goswami, learned Addl Senior Govt Advocate and Mr. B. Banerjee, learned Govt Advocate for the State.

3. Surya Kumar Das, petitioner in Civil Rule No. 18 of 1994 belongs to the Scheduled Caste community and he participated in the selection process for the post of LDA-cum-Typist for District level offices conducted by the Central Recruitment Committee, Dibrugarh. Petitioner's name appeared at SI. No.2 of the select list belonging to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe, as a separate list was prepared for the reserved class and another list for the general classes. Although some appointments were made the petitioner was not appointed.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top