SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 263

N.SURJAMANI SINGH
Margaret Wanrap and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.P.Mahanta, M.Wahlang, B.P.Marngar, B.Bikhar, A.K.Agarwal

N.S. SINGH, J-

These three writ petitions are interrelated each other and involved common question of facts and laws and that being the position these are taken up together for hearing at this stage. Considering the fact that these three writ petitions can be disposed or finally at this stage, these are disposed of accordingly with the following common judgment and order.

2. The petitioners Smt Margaret Wanrap in WP(C) No. 195 (SH)2002. Shri Kosparland Lyngdoh in WP(C) No. 196(SH)2002 and Smti. Prisca Lyndoh in W.P.(C) No. 197 (SH)2002, are the Grade IV employees under the Public Works Department (for short 'PWD') who have rendered their services since 1997, 1984 and 1990, respectively. Their grievance is that the Grade IV employees including the petitioners in P.W.D. Govt. of Meghalaya have no promotional avenue/opportunities but in other departments like Secretariat Administration Deptt. (for short 'SAD'), Government of Meghalaya, those Grade IV employees have promotional avenues/ opportunities to the post of LDA, Duftry, Record Supplier, Typist, etc. and their services are governed by the Meghalaya Subordinate Service Rules, 1973 (for short "Rule of 1973") as amended up to date.

3.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top