SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 435

N.SURJAMANI SINGH
Pratima Palit and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Kirendra Chandra Dey and Anr. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.Dey, D.Choudhary, B.Sarkar , A.K.Paul, B.R.Dey

N.S. Singh, J.-

The judgment and decree dated 1.7.2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Karimganj, in Title Appeal No. 44 of 1997 affirming the judgment and decree dated 20.9.1997, passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Karimganj, in Title Suit No. 166 of 1994, decreeing the suit of the plaintiff, are the subject-matters under challenge in this revision petition.

2. Upon hearing Mr B.R. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioners, and also on persual of the available materials on record, I am of the view that this petition can be disposed of at the motion stage considering the simple nature of the case and simple questions of law involved in the case and, accordingly, this revision petition is disposed of with the following orders.

3. The plaintiff (opposite party No. 1 herein filed a suit being TS No. 166/1994 before the trial Court by invoking the provisions of law laid down under the Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972, (for short, "the Act, 1972) for eviction of the defendants (petitioners herein) from the suit premises and for recovery of Rs. 17007- towards arrear rents for the period from Falguna, 1400 BS to Jaistha, 1401 BS by contending, i












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top