SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 28

H.N.SARMA, M.B.K.SINGH
Purnanand Sharma and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Mahabir Singh and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Nilamani Singh, L.Sashibushan, A.Bimal Singh

H.N Sarma, J.:-

This Letter Patent Appeal arises out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge on 10.09.1997 in F.A.No.2 of 1975, which is the oldest pending Civil Appeal in this Court. Incidentally, this appeal arises out of the suit filed on 16.4.1960, i.e., more than 46 years ago.

2. By virtue of the order impugned in this appeal, the learned Single Judge, inter alia, held that due to expiry of the appellant/defendant Nos-3, 5 and 11, the first appeal will not abet as a whole in the absence of substitution of the legal heirs of those appellants and rejected the preliminary objection raised by the present appellant/plaintiff.

3. We have heard Mr. A. Nilmani Singh ,learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. A.Bimol, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff/appellant as well as Mr. L. Sashibushan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendants/respondents ( appellants in the First Appeal).

4. The short question arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether on the failure to bring on record legal heirs of respondent-appellant Nos-3, 5 and 11, the connected appeal , i.e., F.A. No.2 of 1975 will abet as a whole and whether the other surviving appellan



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top