T. Nandakumar Singh, J.:—

Heard Mr. Tarunkumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Mr. Y. Ashang, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos-1 and 2; none appears for the respondent No.3, in spite of proper service of notice of this writ petition, to him, without showing any cause.

2. On 16.11.2011 Mr. Y. Ashang, learned Government Advocate entered appearance on behalf of the State respondents, i.e. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and the respondents were directed to file affidavit in-opposition on or before the returnable date, i.e. on 14.12.2011. On 14.12.2011, this Court passed an order that the "service report of the respondent No.3 returned unserved with the report that the respondent No.3 refused to accept notice, but for abundant precaution the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is allowed to take steps for service of notice to the respondent No. 3 by Dasti service through the Registry of this Bench." Service of notice to the respondent No.3 was effected by Dasti, for that, the petitioner filed an affidavit dated 17.12.2011 that the service of notice to the respondent No.3 had been effected by Dasti service. In spite of giving sufficient

Click Here to Read the rest of this document