A.R.LAKSHMANAN, ALTAMAS KABIR
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Public Concern for Governance Trust . – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—
CIVIL APPEAL No. 14 of 2007
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 18965 of 2006)
Leave granted.
2. The appellant – State of Maharashtra has filed the above appeal from the judgment and order of the Bombay High Court dated 23.05.2005 only for the purpose of expunging certain remarks made by the High Court, inasmuch as the same may affect the working and functioning of the office of the Chief Minister of the State of Maharashtra.
BACKGROUND FACTS :
3. The City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) is an authority constituted under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) for development of Navi Mumbai as a township.
4. CIDCO grants plots in Navi Mumbai for construction and development under the MRTP Act read with prevalent development control regulations for Navi Mumbai. There are detailed regulations and procedures for allotment of land by CIDCO to various entities.
5. Five different applications were made by respondent Nos. 5 to 10 to the then Chief Minister of Maharashtra who was also the Minister for Urban Development. All business of Urban Development Department was under the control of the Minister for urban development.
Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay v. Dilip Kumar Raghavendranath Natkarni
S. Pratap Singh v. The State of Punjab
Dr. Dilip Kumar Deka & Anr. v. State of Assam & Anr.
State of Bihar v. Lal Krishna Advani & Ors.
A.K.K. Nambiar v. Union of India & Anr.
Rajiv Ranjan Singh ‘Lalan’ (VIII) & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Dr. J.N. Banavalikar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.