S.C.DAS
Narayan Chandra Banik – Appellant
Versus
Siddartha Sankar Ray and Ors. – Respondent
2. Heard learned counsel, Mr. T. Datta Majumder for the appellant and learned counsel, Mr. P. Datta for respondent No.4. None appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
3. Fact, in short, for disposal of the appeal, may be noted, thus :
On 11.6.1999, the appellant was travelling with a jeep vehicle, bearing No.TR-01-2887 from Bishramganj to Agartala and, at about 5.00 p.m., when the vehicle reached at a place, named Gokulnagar (Konaban turning), on Bishalgarh-Agartala road, another truck vehicle, bearing No.TRL-6055, was coming from opposite direction and, both the vehicles had a head on collusion for rash and negligent driving of both the vehicles and, as a result, the jeep vehicle collapsed on the road side, and the appellant and other passengers of the jeep vehicle sustained injuries. The appellant sustained severe injury in his right hand thumb and he was immediately shifted to IGM Hospital wherefrom
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.