I.A.ANSARI, A.C.UPADHYAY
Malsawmkimi and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent
The appellants herein have preferred two different appeals under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, (hereinafter referred to as 'the NIA Act'). The appellant, Mrs. Malsawmkimi, has approached this Court, by way of Criminal Appeal No. 171/2011, aggrieved by the order, dated 09.09.2011, passed by the learned Special Judge, NLA, Guwahati, Assam, rejecting the appellant's prayer for bail in Misc. Case No. 25/2011, arising out of NIA Case No. 01/2009, under Sections 120B/121/121A IPC read with Sections 16, 17, 18 and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. On the other hand, the appellant, George Lawmthang, has preferred an appeal, which has given rise to Crl. Appeal No. 65/2012, aggrieved by the order, dated 23.09.11, passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Guwahati, Assam, in Misc. (Bail) Case No. 30/2011, arising out of in NIA case 01/2009. By this common judgment and order. we propose to dispose of both these appeals together inasmuch as both these appeals are closely inter-linked and, on the request, made by the learned counsel for the parties concerned, have been heard together.
2. We have accordingly heard Mr. D.K. Mi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.