JUDGEMENT AND ORDER (CAV)

1. The above mentioned appeals are directed against the common judgment and order, dated 03.07.2002, passed by the learned District Judge, Tinsukia in Misc (probate) Case No. 114 of 2002 and Misc. Case No. 88 of 2002. As both these appeals have arisen out of the common judgment and order, involving same parties, represented by same sets of Advocate, for the sake of convenience and brevity, I have heard the appeals together and propose to dispose of the said appeals by this common judgment and order.

2. The relevant facts that may be necessary for the purpose of disposal of the appeals, may, in brief, be stated as follows:

(i) The appellant is the wife of late Monoj Gogoi (hereinafter called the deceased) and Master Tusher Gogoi, respondent No.

(ii) in Misc. (probate) Case No. 114 of 2002, is their minor son. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are the brother and the sister respectively of the deceased-husband of the appellant. (ii) The said couple, by entering into an agreement of separation, was living separately and the appellant instituted a proceeding, being Misc.(J) Case No. 128 of 2001, under Sections 18/20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document