SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 88

SUMAN SHYAM
Hazi Abdus Salam Barlaskar – Appellant
Versus
Kanco Enterprises Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.K. Ghosh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. A.C. Sarma, Advocate.

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. S.K. Ghosh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. A.C. Sarma, learned counsel representing the respondent.

2. This appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31-08-2001 passed by the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No. 2, Cachar, Silchar in Money Suit No. 19/1984, partly decreeing the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for an amount of Rs. 5,62,919.69/-. The appeal has been preferred by the defendant No 1.

3. The Plaintiff’s case, in brief, is that the plaintiff M/s. Bengal Tea and Industries Ltd. was the owner of Paloi Tea Estate whereas the defendant No. 1 was the lessee in respect of Rahman Nagar Tea Estate. The plaintiff had been purchasing green leaf leafs from the defendant No. 1 by entering into bilateral agreements from time to time. Accordingly, the original plaintiff viz. M/s Bengal Tea and Industries Ltd. a public limited company, and the appellant/ defendant No. 1 had entered into an agreement dated 04-02-1983, inter alia, laying down the terms and condition



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top