SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UJJAL BHUYAN
Sheo Balak Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: I.H. Saikia, S. Kanungoe.
For the Respondents: S.P. Choudhury.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

Heard Mr. I.H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned Central Govt. Counsel for the respondents.

2. Case was heard on 04.08.2015 and today is fixed for delivery of judgment.

3. Petitioner is serving as Superintending Engineer in the Border Roads Organization. He seeks promotion to the next higher rank of Chief Engineer.

4. Grievance of the petitioner is that he has been given gradings below the benchmark of "very good" i.e., "good" in the relevant Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) which were communicated to him belatedly. Representation submitted by the petitioner was also disposed of very belatedly by a non-speaking order. Consequently, petitioner was not considered for promotion and instead his juniors i.e. respondent Nos. 7 to 10 have been promoted. Hence, the writ petition.

5. In the instant proceeding, petitioner seeks quashing of the ACRs for the following periods:-

(a) 01.04.2001 to 23.07.2001,

(b) 01.04.2002 to 12.12.2002,

(c) 01.04.2003 to 12.12.2003,

(d) 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2006,

(e) 01.04.2006 to 14.01.2



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top