HITESH KUMAR SARMA
Bhabesh Sarmah, S/O Chandra Nath Sarmah – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
1. I have heard Mr. K Bhuyan learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. S Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
2. This criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 04-04-2017, passed in CR Case No. 1097/2013, by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darrang, Mangaldai.
3. The complaint case before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darrang, Mangaldai is against the petitioner/accused for commission of alleged offences under Sections 409/420 of the IPC.
4. The petitioner, herein, received an amount of Rs. 3,50,000/- from complainant/respondent No. 2 for purchasing a new MF 1035 tractor for him, in presence of witnesses, on 20-12-2010, undertaking to return the money to the complainant/respondent No. 2 with interest, if he fails to supply the tractor to him. The accused/petitioner did not purchase the tractor and misappropriated the money.
5. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darrang, Mangaldai, took cognizance of the complaint against the accused/petitioner under Sections 409/420 of IPC and proceeded to examine the witnesses for the complainant/respondent No. 2.
6. After the complainant/respondent No. 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.