MIR ALFAZ ALI
On the death of Late Chauthmal Jalan his legal heirs - Smt. Ratni Devi Jalan – Appellant
Versus
Dindayal Jalan S/o Late Bhaniram Jalan – Respondent
1. This appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.08.2003 passed by the Addl. District Judge No. 3, Kamrup in PTS No. 1/1987 granting probate in favour of the principal respondent/plaintiff.
2. Brief facts of the case are that one Late Rukmini Devi executed a WILL in favour of the respondent, who is the grandson (son of the eldest son) of the testatrix Rukmini Devi, bequeathing the properties mentioned in the WILL. The respondent filed a petition for grant of probate in respect of the said WILL. One Chautmal Jalan (since deceased) predecessor of the appellants, raised objection against granting of probate, alleging that the WILL in question was not executed by Rukmini Devi and the same was also not duly attested as required by law and that the WILL was a fraudulent one as Rukmini Devi was seriously ill and was not physically and mentally fit to execute the WILL. Further contention of the objector was that the property bequeathed did not belong to the testatrix. Contention being raised, the probate case was registered as Title Suit and proceeded accordingly. On death of Chautmal Jalan, his legal heirs
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka vs. Jasjit Singh and Others
Daulat Ram and Others vs. Sodha and Others
Gulam Qadir vs. Special Tribunal and Others
Mahesh Kumar (dead) by LRs vs. Vinod Kumar and Others
Meenakhsiammal and Others vs. Chandra Shekharan and Another
Ryali Kameswara Rao vs. Bendapudi Suryaprakasarao and Others
Surendra Pal and Others vs. Dr. (Mrs.) Saraswati Arora and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.