KALYAN RAI SURANA
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Nath – Respondent
Kalyan Rai Surana, J.
Heard Mrs. R. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. By filing this appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (now renamed as Employees Compensation Act, 1923, hereinafter referred to as the "said Act"), the appellant has challenged the judgment and award dated 02.07.2003, passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Guwahati, awarding compensation of Rs. 93,000/- to the respondent No. 1 together with 9% interest from the date of filing of the claim petition, i.e., 19.08.2002 till realization as well as the order dated 26.07.2007, passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Guwahati, in WC Case No. 190/2002, whereby the prayer for review was rejected. The learned Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Guwahati, by the impugned judgment and award dated 02.07.2003 had held that the respondent herein, namely, Sri Shyam Nath, was an employee of the respondent No. 2 herein and working as Handiman on his Bus bearing number AS-15/3576 and that on 22.07.2002, while he was working in the said vehicle, which was coming from Guwahati towards Barpeta, which met with an accident near Chila Mahe Khetri under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.