UJJAL BHUYAN, PARAN KUMAR PHUKAN
Jamuna Gogoi Phukan – Appellant
Versus
Gauhati High Court – Respondent
Ujjal Bhuyan, J.
1. Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. N. Goswami, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam for respondent No.1 and Mr. U.K. Nair, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. M.P. Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, i.e., Gauhati High Court.
2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of resolution of the Administrative Committee of the Gauhati High Court dated 23.03.2011, resolution of the Full Court of Gauhati High Court dated 28.05.2011 and the Government notification dated 09.06.2011 issued by the Legal Remembrancer and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Judicial Department imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement on the petitioner, a Judicial Officer belonging to the Assam Judicial Service.
3. As would be evident from the above, in this proceeding, we are called upon to adjudicate the legality and correctness of the decision of the Administrative Committee and the Full Court in imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement on a Judicial Officer.
4. Before we proceed further, it would be apposite to remind ourselv
Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya
East Coast Railway v. Mahadev Appa Rao
Madan Mohan Choudhury v. State of Bihar
Managing Director, ECIL v. B. Karunakar
Punjab and Haryana v. Iswar Chand Jain
Rajendra Singh Verma v. Lt. Governor
Ramesh Chander Singh v. High Court of Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.