J.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Madan Mohan Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Judgment
S. Saghir Ahmad, J.-Leave granted.
The recommendation of the High Court on the basis of which the appellant, who held the rank of Addl. District & Sessions Judge, was compulsorily retired from service, exhibits the tragic fact that the highest judicial body of the State which abhors anything done contrary to the rule of law or done in a whimsical manner or arbitrarily, can itself act in that manner on the administrative side. Still, the plea that High Court Judges suffer from “split personality” cannot be accepted for the pleasant fact that though on the administrative side they might have had acted as ordinary bureaucrat, once they don the robes they forget all their previous associations and connections. The transformation is so complete and real that even though they themselves were part of the decision making process, they quash their own administrative decisions in exercise of their power of judicial review and thus maintain the majesty and independence of the Indian judiciary in which the people have always reposed tremendous faith. In the instant case, however, the order of compulsory retirement dated 2.8.1997 passed by the State Government on the High Court’s recom
Mohammad Ghouse v. State of Andhra
Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh v. L.V.A. Dikshitulu
Registrar, High Court of Madras v. R. Rajiah
State of Kerala v. A. Lakshmikutty
Baikuntha Nath Das v. Chief Distt. Medical Officer Baripada
Brij Mohan Singh Chopra v. State of Punjab
Baidyanath Mahapatra v. State of Orissa
Posts & Telegraphs Board v. C.S.N. Murthy
Secretary to the Government Harijan & Tribal Welfare Department Bhubaneswar v. Nityananda Pati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.