B.D.AGARWAL
Rupjyoti Kalita – Appellant
Versus
Rajib Hazarika – Respondent
B.D. Agarwal, J.
The Order dated 13.8.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge, No. 2, Kamrup, Guwahati in Misc. (J) Case No. 34 of 2012 is under challenge in this appeal, filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. By the impugned order, the learned trial judge has rejected the prayer for temporary injunction. Being aggrieved with this order, the plaintiff has preferred this appeal. Heard Mr. BC Das, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. PN Goswami, learned counsel for the respondents. I have also gone through the impugned Order and the documents annexed with the memo of appeal.
2. The petitioner herein has filed the Title Suit No. 140 of 2012 praying for a decree of declaration that the complaints made by the defendants before various authorities on different dates are defamatory in nature and, as such, damages to the tune of Rs. One crore should be granted to the plaintiff and in addition to that an order of permanent injunction should also be passed restraining the defendants from lodging any such complaints in future, which may defame and damage the reputation of the plaintiff in public. Alongwith the suit an application for tempo
Best Sellers Retail (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. and Others
Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd.
Parmajit Bhasin and Others Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Others
R. Rajagopal alias R.R. Gopal and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Shree Maheshwar Hydel Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Chitroopa Palit and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.