SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 1450

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
M.R. PATHAK, J.
Bobita Saikia Deka - Petitioners
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 4136 of 2017
Decided On : 03-09-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: B.N. Gogoi, Adv.
For the Respondents: A. Deka, R.K. Talukdar, P. Nayak and R.M. Deka, Advs.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 309,226 and 227 - Assam Services Pension Rules, 1969 - Rule 135 , 136(1) (a) (iii) and (iv), and 9 - Family Pension, Rules 1969 - Rule143 - Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372 - Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972 - Family Pension – Employment and service - Petitioner on death of her husband a Government employee who served as a Driver in Office of Director of Elementary Education Assam and died in harness and petitioner contended that she is second wife of deceased who served as Driver in Office of Director of Elementary Education Assam while in service and it is stated that marriage between petitioner and her said late husband was solemnized in year as per Hindu rites and from their wedlock a male child was born to them who is a minor and after her marriage – Held, Generally no Court has competence to issue a direction contrary to law nor can Court direct an authority to act in contravention of statutory provisions and Courts are meant to enforce rule of law and not to pass orders or directions which are contrary to what has been injected by law and from above it is seen that as per provisions of said Assam Services Rules a statutory Rule under Article of Constitution of India Family Pension of said late Driver in Office of Director of Elementary Education is payable to respondent and if said deceased Government employee had made nomination for his DCRG during his life time in service it is said nominee or nominees will get benefit of his DCRG as per share if any specified by him in his - Such nomination - If he had not nominated towards his DCRG then DCRG of said deceased Government employee will be shared amongst his Family members as provided in Rule of said Rules where Family is defined in Rule as noted above which includes stepchildren and adopted children and it is to be noted - Assam Services Pension Rules a statutory Rule framed under Article of Constitution of India does not provide for granting of any benefit to an illegitimate child born to a Government employee and for reasons above and as per provision of statutory Pension Rule Assam Services Pension Rules framed under Article of Constitution of India prayer made by petitioner is not tenable in law - Writ petition is dismissed

ORDER :

M.R. PATHAK, J.

1. Heard Dr. B N Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A Deka, learned Standing counsel, Education Department for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Also heard Mr. R K Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, Mr. P Nayak, learned Standing counsel, Finance Department for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. R M Deka, learned counsel for the private respondent No. 5.

2. Matter relates to disbursal of Family Pension and other death benefits to the petitioner on the death of her husband a Government employee who served as a Driver in the Office of the Director of Elementary Education, Assam and died in harness.

3. The petitioner contended that she is the second wife of the deceased who served as Driver in the Office of the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, expired on 15.12.13 while in service. It is stated that marriage between petitioner and her said late husband was solemnized in the year 2000 as per Hindu rites and from their wedlock a male child was born to them who is a minor. After her marriage, petitioner came to know that her husband earlier married to respondent No. 5 and from their said conjugal life they have one daughter, who is already married and two sons who are already major and the respondent No. 5 is well settled as she learnt that said respondent is serving in the Assam Civil Secretariat. Petitioner also stated that during his life time of her said husband sworn an affidavit disowning the respondent No. 5 and her two sons and specifying that they would have no right to claim his movable and immovable properties and also notified it by publishing the same in leading news paper.

4. The petitioner stated that vide No. 2014/2976 dated 06.03.2014, the Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup (Metro) has already issued 'Certificate of Next of Kin' showing her and their minor son as the Next of Kin of her late husband. Petitioner also stated that in Debts Succession Case No. 75/2014, learned District Judge, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati on 04.08.2014 have already issued Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in her favour including Group Insurance, Gratuity, Leave Encashment, Arrear Salary, Arrear Family pension and GPF amount of her late husband.

5. Petitioner with her husband lived in the Quarter No. 6, Block-E, Elementary Education Quarter's Complex, Kahilipara, Guwahati-19 and as she continued to occupy the said Quarter even after three years of death of her husband on 15.12.2017, the Director of Elementary Education on 3rd June, 2017 issued Last and Final Notice to her granting ten days time to vacate the said Quarter informing that failure on her part to comply with the direction made therein, the same will be treated as serious offence and consequential actions would be taken as per Government rules and procedure.

6. At that stage the petitioner has filed this writ petition on 23.06.2017 praying for issuance of writ of Mandamus directing respondents not to evict her from the said residential quarter of Elementary Education Department and to release Family pension and all death benefits in her favour and her minor son.

7. While issuing notice to the respondents, this Court by order dated 21.07.2017 rejected the prayer of the petitioner allowing her to retain the Government Quarter allotted to Bhubneswar Deka, late Driver in the Office of the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, Guwahati and did not interfere with the direction notice dated 03.06.2017 issued by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam and directed the petitioner to vacate the said Quarter within six weeks from the date of said order.

8. On instruction, Dr. B N Gogoi learned Counsel on 21.07.2017 submitted that the petitioner being the second wife of said Bhubneswar Deka, late Driver in the Office of the DEE, Assam, is not claiming any relief or share of the family pension vis-à-vis the respondent No. 5, first wife of said Bhubneswar Deka, but she is pressing this case only for her minor son to t






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top