SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 114

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA, JJ.
Anima Das - Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3056 of 2018
Decided On : 03-01-2019

Advocates Appeared:
S. Banik, Adv.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Illegal Migrants - Petitioner was initially referred under Illegal Migrants Act resulting in IMDT Case - Upon Act being declared ultra vires by Supreme Court reference against petitioner was transferred to Foreigners Tribunal and renumbered - Thereupon on bifurcation of district resulting in creation of district reference against petitioner was again transferred to Foreigners Tribunal and further renumbered - Reference against petitioner was given a final consideration by Foreigners Tribunal as per order by which an opinion was given that petitioner is a foreigner and had entered India after without any valid document and without any authority order of Foreigners Tribunal has been assailed in present writ petition – Held, By taking a view that certificates issued by Headmaster of school cannot be relied upon to arrive at a conclusion that is father of petitioner and in absence of examination of concerned Headmaster it cannot be held that Foreigners Tribunal had given a reason that is bad in law inconsistent unintelligible or inadequate - Neither it can be said in view of proposition laid down by Supreme Court that said reasoning was arrived at by application of a wrong legal test or by taking irrelevant consideration into account or failing to take relevant consideration into account or that it had occasioned a wrongful admission or exclusion of evidence or that a conclusion was arrived without any supporting evidence - Nor it can be said that Tribunal had acted in excess of its jurisdiction or had failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in it or that there is an error in jurisdiction or authority while taking such a view - Accordingly dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

A.M. BUJOR BARUA, J.

1. Heard Mr. S Banik, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A Ali, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India, Mr. J Payeng, learned standing counsel for the State of Assam appearing for the Foreigners Tribunal and Border Affairs, Ms. A Verma, learned standing counsel for the authorities under the NRC as well as Ms. G Sarma, learned counsel for the authorities under the Union of India.

2. The petitioner was initially referred under the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunal) Act, 1983 (for short, the Act of 1983) resulting in IMDT Case No.1766/2003 before the IM(D)T, Nalbari. Upon the Act of 1983 being declared ultra vires by the Supreme Court, the reference against the petitioner was transferred to the Foreigners Tribunal at Nalbari and renumbered as F.T.(Nal) B.Case No.807/2007(old). Thereupon on bifurcation of the Nalbari district resulting in the creation of Baksa district, the reference against the petitioner was again transferred to the Foreigners Tribunal at Baksa at Tamulpur and further renumbered as in FT Case No.325/ Baksa/2015.

3. The reference against the petitioner was given a final consideration by the Foreigners Tribunal at Baksa as per the order dated 23.11.2016 by which an opinion was given that the petitioner is a foreigner and had entered India after 25.03.1971 without any valid document and without any authority. The order of 23.11.2016 of the Foreigners Tribunal Baksa in F.T.Case No.325/Baksa/2015 has been assailed in the present writ petition.

4. Before the Foreigners Tribunal at Baksa, the petitioner took a stand in her written statement that she is a citizen of India by birth and she was born in village Nakhola Grant, PS Morigaon in the district of Morigaon on 16.11.1966 and that the name of her father was Late Kunja Mohan Das, which finds place in the voters list of 1965 under No.82 Morigaon Legislative Assembly Constituency, bearing Sl. No.58, House No.17.

5. A further stand has been taken that in the voters list of 1965, the name of the father of the petitioner was recorded as Kunja Das. In order to substantiate that Kunja Das whose name appears in the voters list of 1965, is the father of the petitioner, a school transfer certificate dated 30.08.1993 issued by the Headmaster of NF Railway High School Jagiroad was exhibited as Ext.2 before the Tribunal.

6. Against the order dated 23.11.2016 of the Foreigners Tribunal at Baksa, a review petition being Misc. Case No.01/Baksa/2018 was also preferred which was given a final consideration by the order dated 17.04.2018. In the order of 17.04.2018, the Tribunal had rejected the review preferred by the petitioner on the ground that there was a delay of 473 days in preferring the same, in a situation where firstly there was no prayer for condoning the delay and secondly a proceeding under the Foreigners Tribunals Order, 1964 being a summary proceeding there is no provision for condoning the delay.

7. In the review, the petitioner had taken a further stand by producing a certificate of the Headmaster dated 30.04.2018 that the date mentioned in the transfer certificate dated 30.08.1993 providing that she had left the school on 31.12.1993 was wrongly mentioned and instead the date of her leaving the school was 31.12.1984. The order dated 17.04.2018 in the Misc.Case No.01/Baksa/2018 has also been assailed in the present writ petition.

8. Both in the original order dated 23.11.2016 as well as in the review order dated 17.04.2018, the transfer certificate dated 30.08.1993 as stood corrected by the later certificate dated 30.04.2011, which was relied upon by the petitioner to establish that her father is Kunja Das whose name appeared in the voter's list of 1965, stood rejected on the ground that the petitioner had failed to examine the concerned Headmaster of the school who was the author of the certificate.

9. In the present writ petition, the petitioner takes the ground that the rejection of the certificates issued























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top